• Home
  • Message from the Editor
  • Who We Are
  • Write for us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact

BucketOrange Magazine

Law For All

[ Law for all ]

Australia’s only legal publication for non-lawyers.

  • Backstage Pass (for Lawyers)
  • Features
  • #BucketOpinion columns
  • Interviews
  • Culture & Lifestyle
  • Law Hacks
  • Travel
  • PopLaw
  • Law Reform
  • Career
  • Startups
  • Online Legal Glossary
  • Events
You are here: Home / Law Hacks / Bucket Intell-O-gence: Nurofen Gets $1.7m Slapdown For Misleading Consumers

Bucket Intell-O-gence: Nurofen Gets $1.7m Slapdown For Misleading Consumers

April 29, 2016 by bucketorange Leave a Comment

0 min read

Nurofen receives $1.7m fine

Reckitt Benckiser, the maker of Nurofen, has been fined $1.7 million dollars for breaching consumer laws.

Last year, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) launched proceedings against the makers of Nurofen in the Federal Court.

Sections 18 and 33 of Australian Consumer Law prohibit businesses from:

  • engaging in misleading and deceptive conduct; and
  • engaging in conduct that might mislead the public about the nature, characteristics of suitability for purpose of goods.

Nurofen’s pain-specific range products promised to target back pain, migraine, tension headache and period pain and were packaged and marketed on this basis. However, all products in this range (which cost almost twice the price of ordinary Nurofen products) contain exactly the same active ingredient: ibuprofen lysine 342mg.

Given that it is not possible to specifically target pain, and that all products contain the same active ingredient, the ACCC found that all products did the same thing and were no more effective at targeting specific areas of pain.

Lawyers for Recktt Benckiser told the court that “rational” consumers would not think a pain-specific product was any more effective than a regular one.

The ACCC argued that Nurofen had made substantial profits from its misleading marketing and that the company should be slapped with a large fine of $6 million dollars.

The court found that Nurofen’s ‘pain-specific’ product range misled consumers, since they all contain the same active ingredients and do the same thing.

The key issue here is that if you thought you were buying a special product, and that product does not actually have a special quality, then you have been misled.

h/t ABC news.

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Filed Under: Law Hacks Tagged With: ACCC, Business, Consumer Law, Federal Court, Misleading and deceptive conduct, Nurofen, Pain-specific products

Legal Notice

The contents of this publication, current at the date of publication set out above, are for reference purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Legal advice about your specific circumstances should always be sought separately before taking any action based on this publication.

Bucket-O in your inbox

BucketOrange Magazine is the first boutique online legal publication created exclusively for young Australians.

Subscribe FREE to receive the latest news and law hacks delivered straight to your inbox.

BucketOrange ~ MADE WITH LOVE

Some think love can be measured by the number of times their heart races. Others think love can be declared with diamonds, flowers or grand romantic gestures. But we think love can only truly be demonstrated by actions. It can be found in the little things, like making a mixtape, or peeling an orange for someone because you know they don't like doing it.

That's why we created BucketOrange Magazine. We understand that sometimes in life the things that are good for us come in inconvenient packages. Exercise is important, but requires dedication. Eating well is crucial, but requires discipline. Maintaining your legal health is critical, but the law is hard to digest.

BucketOrange is a hand-crafted labour of love. With each word we unpeel the law's greatest mysteries into bite-sized segments - so all that's left for you to do is consume, enjoy and share the love!

#LoveTheLaw

Many drops make a bucket. How will you fill yours? Follow us to see stories that matter.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Recent Posts

  • Law Chats & Freebies! 5 Minutes With Elodie Cheesman On Her New Book “Love, In Theory”
  • Chamberlains Seeking Witnesses of Institutional Abuse at Gymnastics Australia
  • Domestic Violence: The Invisible Victims of COVID-19
  • #BucketOpinion: Adding Value Without the Added Hours in a Legal Role
  • COVID-19: What Are Your Employee Rights?
  • #BucketOpinion: Future and Impact of COVID-19 on the Legal Industry
 
Women in Law Awards Finalist 2016 Thought Leader of the Year
Lawyers Weekly Women In Law Awards Finalist 2015
2015 Legal Innovation Index Finalist
 

Advertisement

Backstage Pass for Lawyers

Law Chats & Freebies! 5 Minutes With Elodie Cheesman On Her New Book “Love, In Theory”

By bucketorange

#BucketOpinion: Adding Value Without the Added Hours in a Legal Role

By bucketorange

#BucketOpinion: Future and Impact of COVID-19 on the Legal Industry

By bucketorange

Mental health support for CEOs

Wellbeing From The Top Down: Mental Health Support For CEOs And Business Leaders

By bucketorange

Colour Psychology: What Your Logo Says About Your Law Firm  

Colour Psychology: What Your Logo Says About Your Law Firm  

By Pamela Webber

Advertisement

[instagram-feed]

Tweets by @bucketorange

Looking for something?

Copyright © 2022 BucketOrange Magazine. All Rights Reserved.

%d