BucketOrange Magazine http://bucketorange.com.au Law For All Sat, 29 Oct 2022 11:37:58 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3 http://bucketorange.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/cropped-11162059_848435651860568_6898301859744567521_o-32x32.jpg BucketOrange Magazine http://bucketorange.com.au 32 32 249117990 Laws Of Conversation: How To Argue Like A Lawyer (Vol. 2) http://bucketorange.com.au/argue-like-lawyer-vol-2/ http://bucketorange.com.au/argue-like-lawyer-vol-2/#respond Fri, 03 Nov 2017 23:34:27 +0000 http://bucketorange.com.au/?p=7315

Love them or hate them, learning to argue like a lawyer is still everyone’s obsession.

It’s not just because lawyers can always identify the appropriate moment to combine
mind-bending reasoning and logic with rapid-fire silver-tongued rhetoric in a way that consistently obliterates the opposition in an argument (although that’s a big part of it).

It’s because lawyers also know that with great power comes great responsibility. Sometimes in an argument – like Aesop’s Fable, The Wind & The Sun – choosing a moderate and persuasive approach can often get you further than force.

The key to a lawyer’s coveted communication arsenal, then, is an acute awareness of personal and professional scenarios with the potential to quickly escalate out of control, and the unique ability to make a snap assessment about the best course of action.

While lawyers intuitively know when to cool their jets by offering considered and conciliatory responses in a negotiation, they also recognise that sometimes not giving any ground and adding an accelerant to an already inflamed situation is unavoidable.

It’s a little-known fact that the ability to argue like a lawyer has little to do with formal legal training and a lot to do with a few key courtroom hacks you can apply to your personal and professional life today.

Arguing a point vs effective communication

Arguing is about point scoring.

At its most cutthroat, arguments can be an ugly excuse to take out the day’s frustrations, air past grievances, jealousies, hurts or regrets by verbally attacking your opponent and, in some instances, leaving them reeling for hours, or even days, after the interaction.

If you want your opponent to accept your point of view, you need to start thinking about your interactions as less of an ‘argument’ and more of an ‘art’ form.

1. The art of persuasion

Lawyers are experts at analysing a lot of information, distilling evidence and getting straight to the heart of an issue.

In a professional setting, there is much to be gained by arguing a point effectively such as credibility, respect, and maybe even a promotion. Personal settings are generally more about compromise.

Most of us don’t respond well to insults or being told that we are wrong. So if your ultimate goal is to convince your opponent that your point of view is correct, aim to be persuasive rather than incendiary.

Lawyer it

Avoid the temptation to jump head first into a no-holds-barred shouting match to let off some steam.

Convincing someone to adopt your point of view is an exercise in patience, persuasion and suggestion. To win someone to your point of view, they must almost believe that they came up with the idea themselves.

Lawyers avoid descending into shouting matches because it’s an opportunity for your opponent to glean potentially sensitive information from you which could be used to your detriment at a later stage.

2. Know your subject matter

A common trap many of us fall into, especially when arguing about something we are passionate about, is to defend our position using every shred of evidence, even irrelevant material and subjective opinions.

These sorts of debates invariably descend into irrational and fruitless arguments that draw on an array of unrelated issues and that leave both people feeling frustrated and in no better position than when they originally started.

Lawyer it

If you want to consistently win arguments like a lawyer, make sure that you prepare.

Law is lyfe.

Wherever possible, good lawyers avoid asking a question in court unless they already know the answer to it. This eliminates the possibility of being surprised by a response that could compromise your case. 

The same logic applies to everyday scenarios.

If you understand your opponent through meticulous preparation, it is possible to anticipate their arguments and apply tactical pressure to win.

This is one of the reasons that lawyers are highly skilled at presenting an effective argument. They consider issues from multiple angles and forecast their opponent’s next move. 

3. Choose your words carefully

Word choice in arguments is more important than most of us realise.

If you want to win a point, wherever possible, avoid unnecessary ‘fluff’ words that carry no real weight or meaning.

Hesitation = annihilation.

This is a red flag to your opponent that you are wavering, unsure of yourself, and that your thoughts are unstructured – something that they can easily use to their advantage.

Lawyer it

Words are like currency for lawyers, so spend yours wisely.

Keep your argument clear and simple, and make your point quickly.

4. Steer clear of your feelings

Emotion is subjective and clouds your judgement which is why lawyers leave it at the door when entering the courtroom. 

They say that about lawyers too :'(

A strong emotional response makes it difficult to present a convincing argument and is also the quickest way to lose an argument. Becoming angry or displaying other visible signs of distress such as flushing, tearing up, waving hands in the air or becoming aggressive are red hot cues to your opponent that you have lost your way and that your arguments have become irrational and implausible. 

Becoming emotional advertises your weaknesses to your opponent, effectively handing them the ammunition needed to focus their strategy and distract you from your core objective. 

Lawyer it

If you have an issue that needs resolving, never start the conversation when you’re tired, cold or hungryIt’s a surefire way to start a conflict, to say something that you regret, or to irreparably destroy a relationship.

Lawyers stay in control by sticking to the facts.

This ability to remain calm, focused, objective and in control of an escalating situation is a unique type of emotional intelligence that comes from years of legal training. It’s also one of the reasons why lawyers are able to navigate high-conflict personal or professional situations with relative ease. 

Try to remove yourself mentally from a situation and stick with the facts, not how you feel about the facts.

Understanding yourself, your unconscious biases and knowing which issues are likely to trigger an emotional response in you is critical. This way you can develop strategies to harness those emotions in a positive way.

At the end of the day

It is the mark of an intelligent mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.” – Aristotle

Some of the best arguments are not actually arguments at all but heated debates in which both people openly share opposing views, and walk away intellectually stimulated having learnt something new.

Lawyers are highly successful communicators because they know when to toe the line by respectfully listening to their opponents and when to bring down the hammer. Wherever possible, avoid emotion, stick to the point and foster a constructive discussion rather than a critical argument. This way, both you and your opponent walk away winners.

What strategies do you use when an inevitable disagreement surfaces in your personal or professional life? Let us know in the comments!

More on BucketOrange Magazine

]]>
http://bucketorange.com.au/argue-like-lawyer-vol-2/feed/ 0 7315
Laws Of Conversation: How To Argue Like A Lawyer http://bucketorange.com.au/the-laws-of-conversation-how-to-argue-like-a-lawyer/ http://bucketorange.com.au/the-laws-of-conversation-how-to-argue-like-a-lawyer/#respond Mon, 15 Jun 2015 12:58:13 +0000 http://bucketorange.com.au/?p=1442

Lawyers tend to get a bad wrap.

From perceived profiteering from the misfortune of others to exorbitant fees and long delays in litigation, many young Australians would prefer a meaningful exchange with a sledgehammer and their face over a conversation with a legal professional.

But while lawyers have long-endured all manner of jokes and deeply-entrenched cultural stereotypes, there are many practical benefits to legal training. When it comes to going toe-to-toe in an argument with the lawyer in your social group, for example, you can bet that few are willing to take on the challenge. Why?

Because lawyers not only understand how to argue a point; they also know how to win the point.

The good news is that presenting an effective argument is a learned skill that has little to do with formal legal training, and a lot to do with a few practical strategies. So what is the secret to winning an argument?

Act like a lady; argue like a lawyer.

1. Identify The Issue And Don’t Deviate From It

Recognise the main point of discussion and stick with it.

When someone challenges our views, our natural reaction is to defend ourselves with all available evidence. Particularly if the issue is a deeply contentious one (such as immigration detention centres, people smuggling, human rights, climate change, environmental issues, the Federal Budget or marriage equality) your brain will perceive many different, but unrelated, ways to further your point.

This grassroots response is natural. But it will not help you win your argument.

The main risk here is that your debate will quickly and irretrievably deviate from the subject at hand to one that does not progress the current issue at all. This is where it is easy to become lost in a sea of unrelated issues.

How To Get Your Lawyer On:

Lawyers stick with the topic.

Subjective opinions are not objective facts. No matter what strategies the opposing side uses to distract you from the main issue, or how tempting it is to draw in other connections, a good lawyer always brings the argument back to the original point.

2. Leave Emotion At The Door!

Emotion will never win an argument.

When we feel strongly about a subject, it is likely that our views are informed by past personal experiences. A strong emotional response to someone challenging these views leaves us not only vulnerable to feelings of personal attack, but also not thinking clearly. This can lead to anger, resentfulness, jealousy, defensiveness or distress.

We may naturally cast the conversational net wider in search of ‘evidence’ to support our position. However, introducing new subjective issues can easily lead to a no-holds-barred shouting match.

Becoming emotional is like giving your opponent a bill board-sized signal advertising your weak spot.

Emotion makes it difficult for us to present a convincing argument. Negative displays of body language such as yelling, crying, sighing, eye rolling or name-calling is a waste of the mental energy required to win your argument. It fortifies your opponent’s psychological and emotional defences meaning that from this point, no matter how persuasive you are, you have already lost the battle.

Emotion deafens us to conflicting points of view meaning your opponent can no longer hear what you are saying. 

How To Get Your Lawyer On:

Lawyers stay calm and stick with the facts.

2fbb6c18abfd68f760761dce8b63496b

When it comes to arguments or negotiations, emotion is weakness.

Even if lawyers are provoked, or are emotionally connected with a particular subject, they do not allow their opponent to use it to their advantage.

It gives them the ammunition they need to focus their own strategy, distract you from your core objective and, ultimately, win the argument.

3. Be Wary Of Shifting Dialogues

A strategy often used by those with limited argumentative skills is to shift the overall dialogue.

This is achieved by drawing in related, but irrelevant topics. The debate slowly moves away from the central issue to similar sub-issues meaning that the original topic is never dealt with.

You will have noticed politicians using this strategy to avoid direct responses to journalists.

The result is a circular debate that fails to progress the original topic or come to any solid conclusions. Introducing a secondary conversational theme is often an attempt to shift the conversational landscape to something your opponent is more comfortable discussing. When this happens, rest assured that you have the upper hand.

How To Get Your Lawyer On: 

Lawyers are not drawn in by a conversational bait and switch.

tumblr_lojdmy3wS51qb87bqo1_500

They hold their ground and remind their opponent of the real issue.

At The End Of The Day

A lawyer’s ability to win an argument can be summed up by a few key skills: organising ideas and delivering them effectively.

Keep your discussions on the right path by understanding exactly what you are debating and, no matter what strategies your opponent uses to distract, intimidate, confuse or shift the conversational ground beneath you, always bring the argument back to the original point.

Use these tactics and you will never lose another argument.

At least not the one you originally started.

More on BucketOrange Magazine

]]>
http://bucketorange.com.au/the-laws-of-conversation-how-to-argue-like-a-lawyer/feed/ 0 1442